Free toolsTAM, SAM and SOM
TAM, SAM and SOM, built from the bottom up
Count the buyers, price the category, then take the share your capacity can actually serve. The arithmetic is shown line by line, because a share-of-a-large-market claim is the classic unfundable market section.
TAM
$20.2M
SAM
$4M
SOM
$161.3K
The arithmetic
Shown line by line, because a market section that states a number without a derivation is the single most common reason one gets sent back.
people in the catchment
120,000
Of whom are plausible buyers
42,000
35% of 120,000
Spend each per year
$480
Total addressable market
$20.2M
42,000 × spend
Serviceable, given where and how we sell
$4M
20% of the total
Obtainable inside the plan horizon
$161.3K
4% of serviceable
336 customers at this spend
That obtainable share is 336 customers.
This is the line to check first. Can you actually serve that many — with the premises, the staff and the hours you have modelled? Most market sections that do not survive contact with a reader fail right here, not on the TAM.
In the product this sizing is cross-checked two further ways: against a published market figure, which is inadmissible without a dated retrievable citation, and against the revenue your own model projects for year three. A plan whose model outruns the market it claims is caught before it is sent.
How this is computed
Founders writing a market section, and anyone who has been told their market size is not credible and cannot see why.
- TAM is the qualified population times what one of them spends in a year. SAM narrows it to what your geography, channel and capacity can reach. SOM is the share of that you expect to hold.
- Every step prints its own working, so the result reads as a derivation rather than a number.
- The implied customer count comes back out of SOM, which is the figure an operator can check against their own capacity — most impossible market sections fail here first.
What it will not tell you
A calculator that lists only what it does is a toy. These are the limits worth knowing before you quote the answer to anyone.
- A top-down cross-check needs a dated, retrievable source. In the product an uncited published figure is inadmissible rather than quietly accepted, and this page follows the same rule.
- Bottom-up sizing is only as good as the population count. Write down where yours came from.
This number belongs in a document that agrees with it.
The full plan links every one of these together and blocks export until the prose and the model reconcile. Free to generate and read.