Plan review
Graded against the rubric your reader actually uses.
Before you send it, the plan is scored against the criteria a lender, an investor or an adjudicator applies — with a severity-ranked redline and a queue of specific fixes. You can also bring a plan you wrote elsewhere and have it graded.
Twelve blocking checks and eight advisory ones. Each finding names the remedy, not just the problem.
The consistency checker
Every figure in the narrative is diffed against the model. Prose claiming forty per cent growth against a model showing twelve, or eight employees against a payroll carrying five, is caught and held — export stays locked until they agree.
Checks that block, and checks that advise
Statement integrity, cash adequacy, owner compensation, monthly detail, cited statistics, named competitors, bottom-up sizing and a coherent downside all block. Benchmark deviations, thin coverage, long payback and flat cost lines advise — because they may be defensible, and that is your call to make.
- Benchmarks warn; they never overwrite your assumption
- Findings link straight to the field that fixes them
- Severity reflects who is reading: an SBA submission is held to more than an internal draft
What this does not do
Any page that lists only strengths is marketing. These are the limits we would want to know about.
- A clean review is not an approval. It means the arithmetic and the evidence will not be the reason you are declined.
Start with the numbers.
Free to generate and read. Pay once, when you are ready to send it.